| diana_coman: | hanbot I do use this to bundle and I did check at the time the code posted - added it onto a fresh client, compiled and it worked | [02:21] |
| diana_coman: | the complain re used claim is fine and not a problem (i.e. given by server as it should and no trouble for bundling) | [02:21] |
| diana_coman: | similarly the complaint re not right for what you have in mind is due to build/craft not proceeding further than bundle so fine again | [02:22] |
| diana_coman: | so only trouble is that bot apparently fails to proceed to make next bundle; paste somewhere the output in bot's window | [02:23] |
| diana_coman: | I usually start it /bot bundle 50 or similar | [02:23] |
| diana_coman: | does the bot take the bundle into inv? | [02:24] |
| hanbot: | diana_coman bot's window upon /bot bundle 8: http://wotpaste.cascadianhacker.com/pastes/BInOc/?raw=true bundle stays in container, bot doesn't move it no. | [17:02] |
| diana_coman: | hanbot, looking at your output and at the crazy formatting mess wordpress made of the post, I wonder if you commented out/missed the long line starting with if (mesg.contents.GetSize()>0 && mesg.contents[0].name.Find("Bundle") < mesg.contents | [19:28] |
| diana_coman: | that one sets the bundleReady flag (which seems to remain unset for you) | [19:28] |
| diana_coman: | other than that: it should still take the bundle at timeout but timeout can be long - perhaps try changing that to something shorter if you want to check that it solves the issue | [19:29] |
| diana_coman: | basically that should be several lines, not sure what happened there,sigh; ftr: | [19:32] |
| diana_coman: | if (mesg.contents.GetSize()>0 && mesg.contents[0].name.Find("Bundle") < mesg.contents[0].name.Length()) //it is a bundle | [19:32] |
| diana_coman: | { | [19:32] |
| diana_coman: | bundleReady = true; //hey, we've got a bundle, we can go ahead! | [19:32] |
| diana_coman: | } | [19:32] |
| diana_coman: | } } | [19:32] |
| diana_coman: | else if (!recipeReady && message->GetType() == MSGTYPE_CRAFT_INFO) | [19:32] |
Comments feed: RSS 2.0