#ossasepia Logs for 29 Nov 2019



April 21st, 2020 by Diana Coman
diana_coman: whaack: ok. [03:15]
diana_coman: jfw: looks good; is the fundamental approach in that thread clear now? [03:21]
diana_coman: dorion_road: you have a broken link/messed up tags on "previous mention of rolling back " [14:05]
diana_coman: such a pleasant read otherwise. [14:12]
dorion_road: diana_coman thank you, glad to hear it was pleasant, I fixed the link. [18:12]
dorion_road: I'm pretty tied down with festivities here, which will be cooling off sunday, and have also yielded renewing old connections that could be resourceful. I will catch up further tomorrow morning. [18:17]
jfw: http://ossasepia.com/2020/04/21/ossasepia-logs-for-29-Nov-2019#1011654 - will answer in #t since MP asked as well. [19:10]
ossabot: Logged on 2019-11-29 03:21:00 diana_coman: jfw: looks good; is the fundamental approach in that thread clear now? [19:10]
jfw: diana_coman: the widget filtering part of http://ossasepia.com/2019/11/29/comments-filtering-for-mp-wp/ works for me, ty. Do you know if pingbacks are still supposed to be in the comments RSS? I recall some mention of this but can't seem to find it. [20:49]
jfw: ahh my blog looks so much nicer now. Main thing still missing afaik is titles-only archive. [21:16]
jfw: dorion_mode, gimme a shout if you want a hand with the comment filtration or otherwise. [21:18]
jfw: pretty easy tho. [21:18]
jfw: dorion_mode: also any thoughts re http://logs.ossasepia.com/log/trilema/2019-11-29#1953896 . [21:20]
ossabot: (trilema) 2019-11-29 jfw: mircea_popescu: nifty, thanks. Will see if I can accomodate on this pass; otherwise what I'd be working toward is a wallet that's still "declared" but with keys not accessible to node. [21:20]
jfw: The q = a + b thing he mentions could, in the most literal interpretation, be done with but a minor schema change in the current plan, though I do suspect the full index is necessary to fully generalize as I think he has in mind. [21:24]
jfw: ooh, perhaps I digest the Luby paper on the plane. [21:25]
jfw: also lol, wondering how serious http://logs.ossasepia.com/log/trilema/2019-11-29#1953855 is. MS-DOS v2.0 source doesn't fit in 1MB :D [21:37]
ossabot: (trilema) 2019-11-29 mircea_popescu: aaaanyways. my chief takeaways from spyked 's article are that 1) a multi-gb os is a joke, no matter how you turn this. it is deeply unclear to me 1mb is a defensible amt of space for the os to occupy, [21:37]
BingoBoingo: jfw: I read that is he sees a lot of open questions that can prevent an OS from fitting in just one meg [21:42]
BingoBoingo: And as a critique of chasing absolute minimalism for minimalism's sake [21:42]
jfw: BingoBoingo: ohh so 1mb as unjustifiably *small*? that'd make a lot more sense [21:44]
BingoBoingo: Multi gigs, too big. 1 MB probably too small. [21:52]
jfw: thimbronion: maybe try normal internet rather than ipv6, say by putting freenode in your hosts file? [22:04]
thimbronion: Ok, since it happened again after they said the problem was resolved, I'm parting. I will try your suggestion jfw. [22:17]
thimbronion: In the meantime I can be found in #exusia should anyone wish to contact me via irc. [22:18]
thimbronion: #exusiae, rather [22:19]

Comments feed: RSS 2.0

Leave a Reply