#eulora Logs for 28 Dec 2015



December 28th, 2015 by Diana Coman
Birdman: anyone want lotus harlets q46 for 750ea? [00:29]
Birdman: ehh nvm thats higher than base value [00:35]
mircea_popescu: soooo 253 md out of 8500 tries (ran out of lbn) [08:11]
mircea_popescu: 8500Ã\u0097187+(1111â\u0088\u00921006)Ã\u0097180Ã\u00971.49+200Ã\u009730 = 1623661 for this run. [08:12]
mircea_popescu: means i should be getting no less than 160\% per base-adjusted md to "1/3 break even". [08:13]
mircea_popescu: and now the question of the ages : does THIS batch of md come to about half the cost of the other one because this run WASN'T baseline, or because the other run was just too expensive ? [08:14]
diana_coman: 160\% is kind of doable on md I'd say, esp is really high q [08:30]
diana_coman: esp if really high q, I meant [08:32]
diana_coman: updated cookbook with bill of materials and calculated base value (so for all items with available info); there's also a change of page names unfortunately, due to clashing mnemonics e.g. tm = tuber milk = treebark mockasillies [10:25]
mircea_popescu: well... 124 [10:58]
diana_coman: hey, it's better than my 118, lol [10:59]
mircea_popescu: lol [10:59]
mircea_popescu: diana_coman btw got ae ? [11:01]
diana_coman: well, I got them, same as pss, but I kind of need them for my own cs run; got any ae ordinaries? [11:01]
mircea_popescu: mnop. [11:02]
diana_coman: I'm buying them and will sell ae if I ever manage to get enough of them [11:02]
mircea_popescu: aite. [11:02]
mircea_popescu: just gonna do a little ft run here an' see. [11:02]
mircea_popescu: need some bps anyway [11:02]
diana_coman: aha, I just finished one samovar making ft only [11:02]
diana_coman: it's still a bit weird the cooking stuff for me as in (for once!) good weird: 106q at 117 rank, vs 119q at 326 mcguyver [11:03]
diana_coman: but now I can see a new samovar crisis due to no st [11:04]
mircea_popescu: making 147, not so terribru [12:13]
diana_coman: so you get 142 on mcguyver but 147 on gung-ho? do you have higher gung-ho? [12:23]
mircea_popescu: just about ther same. [12:23]
mircea_popescu: clearly i should drop mcguyver huh [12:24]
mircea_popescu: of course... maybe lower quality is better for loot [12:25]
diana_coman: so weird as it seems then that gung-ho is simply...easier? [12:27]
diana_coman: it's not just me or something [12:28]
mircea_popescu: 13 points less for 200 ranks does not necessarily mean it's easier for you tho [12:29]
mircea_popescu: what q do you tinker ? [12:30]
diana_coman: 112 ...and it's been for a while, lol [12:30]
diana_coman: my point was: 117/106 = 1.1 ; 326/119=2.73 [12:30]
mircea_popescu: yes, but this neglects the tinkering impact. suppose tinkering provides 100 points from there. [12:31]
mircea_popescu: now you get 6/117 vs 19 / 326 [12:31]
diana_coman: that is why I said easier: more q gain per rank; then again, can't tell if it's just because of non-linear increase [12:31]
diana_coman: what do you mean from there? [12:31]
mircea_popescu: if out of the 106 points you get in cooking tinkering provides 100, that leaves 6 points to be provided by the 117 rank. [12:32]
diana_coman: uhm, for one thing, kind of no [12:32]
mircea_popescu: well yes kind of no, but for the sake of argument. [12:32]
diana_coman: for the simple reason that I was cooking below 100 lol [12:32]
diana_coman: I see [12:33]
mircea_popescu: it;'s not ~just~ the two things you say. it's also the sliding scale of how much in it is actually tinkering [12:33]
diana_coman: of course, it's not even that the whole thing for sure [12:33]
diana_coman: but there is no way of knowing how much exactly is tinkering in there [12:33]
diana_coman: or if it is a fixed quantity for that matter [12:33]
diana_coman: I mean: it can impact it in any way really [12:34]
mircea_popescu: well, actually, if you get mcguyver skill = cooking skill then the difference would be... [12:34]
mircea_popescu: hm. darn. [12:34]
mircea_popescu: the difference would be the tinkering impact +- the difference between the two skills impact lol [12:34]
diana_coman: lol [12:34]
mircea_popescu: dude how did i make this jewel. [12:34]
diana_coman: with a chetty stick :p [12:34]
mircea_popescu: quite [12:35]
mircea_popescu: so successfully resisting reversing for what, almost a year now ? [12:35]
diana_coman: well, reversing stuff is quite by definition a very hard problem [12:35]
diana_coman: when you have only the outputs [12:35]
diana_coman: as they can come from whatever stuff in the end, even random from all one can say [12:36]
diana_coman: mhm, one *could* record the exact increase in mcguyver brought by ranking up *one* level in tinkering, of course [12:38]
diana_coman: but that would again be not entirely useful as one increase at one level is not the same as at another level, so not sure [12:38]
mircea_popescu: yeah. [12:38]
diana_coman: anyway, will try maybe to catch something like that out of curiosity [12:39]
mircea_popescu: there are some numeric approaches available, curious if anything comes of any of em [12:39]
diana_coman: not sure if it's possible for cooking though [12:39]
mircea_popescu: well you see both... how much tinkering gain is needed for +1 q of each [12:41]
diana_coman: mircea_popescu> well you see both... how much tinkering gain is needed for +1 q of each <- that's the thing: not sure you can; on mcguyver you can easily see due to making sticks - as soon as you get one level up in tink, you see how much 0.2 or whatever it gave you; however if you wait for full 1 q point, you might get 1 level of mcguyver in between too and then how exactly do you know which one or how much? [13:53]
diana_coman: maybe to do only tinkering until +1 in mcguyver /gung-ho, mhm [14:32]
mircea_popescu: yea\ [14:48]
mircea_popescu: soo... anyone want 71 FT q 147 ? [14:54]
diana_coman: what markup on those? [15:15]
mircea_popescu: mmm [15:21]
mircea_popescu: 142\% [15:22]
diana_coman: I'll pass, thanks [16:20]

Comments feed: RSS 2.0

Leave a Reply