| lobbesbot: | A#353 O=200k HB=200k E=08-07 21:52:31 (17h36) >>> 250k rr q1 | [00:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#352 O=169k HB=169k E=08-07 21:48:47 (17h32) >>> 100k wwb q1 | [00:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (35h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [00:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#354 O=5.05mn HB=6.5mn E=08-07 20:56:54 (16h40) >>> 16 imp stone adze q315940 | [00:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 6.869mn total bids --- | [00:16] |
| TingPing14: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake | [01:40] |
| TingPing14: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [01:40] |
| TingPing14: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [01:40] |
| TingPing14: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [01:40] |
| TingPing14: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [01:40] |
| lobbesbot: | A#353 O=200k HB=200k E=08-07 21:52:31 (15h36) >>> 250k rr q1 | [02:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#352 O=169k HB=169k E=08-07 21:48:47 (15h32) >>> 100k wwb q1 | [02:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (33h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [02:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#354 O=5.05mn HB=6.5mn E=08-07 20:56:54 (14h40) >>> 16 imp stone adze q315940 | [02:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 6.869mn total bids --- | [02:16] |
| Lildirt: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [02:21] |
| Lildirt: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [02:21] |
| Lildirt: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [02:21] |
| Lildirt: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [02:21] |
| Lildirt: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [02:21] |
| diana_coman: | congrats on lapidary pops danielpbarron | [03:08] |
| Peetz0r25: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [03:14] |
| Peetz0r25: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [03:14] |
| Peetz0r25: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [03:14] |
| Peetz0r25: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [03:14] |
| Peetz0r25: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [03:14] |
| lobbesbot: | A#353 O=200k HB=200k E=08-07 21:52:31 (14h36) >>> 250k rr q1 | [03:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#352 O=169k HB=169k E=08-07 21:48:47 (14h32) >>> 100k wwb q1 | [03:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (32h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [03:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#354 O=5.05mn HB=6.5mn E=08-07 20:56:54 (13h40) >>> 16 imp stone adze q315940 | [03:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 6.869mn total bids --- | [03:16] |
| Menche29: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [03:28] |
| Menche29: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [03:28] |
| Menche29: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [03:29] |
| Menche29: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [03:29] |
| Menche29: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [03:29] |
| lobbesbot: | A#353 O=200k HB=200k E=08-07 21:52:31 (13h36) >>> 250k rr q1 | [04:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#352 O=169k HB=169k E=08-07 21:48:47 (13h32) >>> 100k wwb q1 | [04:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (31h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [04:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#354 O=5.05mn HB=6.5mn E=08-07 20:56:54 (12h40) >>> 16 imp stone adze q315940 | [04:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 6.869mn total bids --- | [04:16] |
| diana_coman: | oh hey, I got a q181 mysterious rock | [04:30] |
| davidebeatrici19: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [04:43] |
| davidebeatrici19: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [04:43] |
| davidebeatrici19: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [04:43] |
| davidebeatrici19: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [04:43] |
| davidebeatrici19: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [04:43] |
| lobbesbot: | A#353 O=200k HB=200k E=08-07 21:52:31 (12h36) >>> 250k rr q1 | [05:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#352 O=169k HB=169k E=08-07 21:48:47 (12h32) >>> 100k wwb q1 | [05:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (30h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [05:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#354 O=5.05mn HB=6.5mn E=08-07 20:56:54 (11h40) >>> 16 imp stone adze q315940 | [05:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 6.869mn total bids --- | [05:16] |
| timvisher10: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [05:21] |
| timvisher10: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [05:21] |
| timvisher10: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [05:21] |
| timvisher10: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [05:21] |
| timvisher10: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [05:21] |
| christel11: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [05:43] |
| christel11: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [05:43] |
| christel11: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [05:43] |
| christel11: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [05:43] |
| christel11: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [05:43] |
| wiggle: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [06:01] |
| wiggle: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [06:01] |
| wiggle: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [06:01] |
| wiggle: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [06:01] |
| wiggle: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [06:01] |
| lobbesbot: | A#353 O=200k HB=200k E=08-07 21:52:31 (11h36) >>> 250k rr q1 | [06:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#352 O=169k HB=169k E=08-07 21:48:47 (11h32) >>> 100k wwb q1 | [06:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (29h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [06:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#354 O=5.05mn HB=6.5mn E=08-07 20:56:54 (10h40) >>> 16 imp stone adze q315940 | [06:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 6.869mn total bids --- | [06:16] |
| lutki_: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [06:35] |
| lutki_: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [06:35] |
| lutki_: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [06:35] |
| lutki_: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [06:35] |
| lutki_: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [06:35] |
| lobbesbot: | A#353 O=200k HB=200k E=08-07 21:52:31 (10h36) >>> 250k rr q1 | [07:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#352 O=169k HB=169k E=08-07 21:48:47 (10h32) >>> 100k wwb q1 | [07:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (28h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [07:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#354 O=5.05mn HB=6.5mn E=08-07 20:56:54 (9h40) >>> 16 imp stone adze q315940 | [07:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 6.869mn total bids --- | [07:16] |
| diana_coman: | !QAuction 2.15m 48 34426 B q88 | [07:40] |
| lobbesbot: | AUCTION # 355 STARTED by diana_coman: 34426 B q88 Opening: 2.15m coppers Ending: 2018-08-09 11:40:50 UTC (48 hours) | [07:40] |
| pokk15: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [07:50] |
| pokk15: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [07:50] |
| pokk15: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [07:50] |
| pokk15: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [07:50] |
| lobbesbot: | A#353 O=200k HB=200k E=08-07 21:52:31 (9h36) >>> 250k rr q1 | [08:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#352 O=169k HB=169k E=08-07 21:48:47 (9h32) >>> 100k wwb q1 | [08:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#355 O=2.15mn HB=No bids E=08-09 11:40:50 (47h24) >>> 34426 B q88 | [08:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (27h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [08:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#354 O=5.05mn HB=6.5mn E=08-07 20:56:54 (8h40) >>> 16 imp stone adze q315940 | [08:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 6.869mn total bids --- | [08:16] |
| xous26: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [08:55] |
| xous26: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [08:55] |
| xous26: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [08:55] |
| xous26: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [08:55] |
| xous26: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [08:55] |
| darkengine16: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [09:02] |
| darkengine16: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [09:02] |
| darkengine16: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [09:02] |
| darkengine16: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [09:02] |
| darkengine16: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [09:02] |
| lobbesbot: | A#353 O=200k HB=200k E=08-07 21:52:31 (8h36) >>> 250k rr q1 | [09:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#352 O=169k HB=169k E=08-07 21:48:47 (8h32) >>> 100k wwb q1 | [09:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#355 O=2.15mn HB=No bids E=08-09 11:40:50 (46h24) >>> 34426 B q88 | [09:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (26h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [09:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#354 O=5.05mn HB=6.5mn E=08-07 20:56:54 (7h40) >>> 16 imp stone adze q315940 | [09:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 6.869mn total bids --- | [09:16] |
| hvxgr16: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [09:46] |
| hvxgr16: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [09:46] |
| hvxgr16: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [09:46] |
| hvxgr16: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [09:46] |
| hvxgr16: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [09:46] |
| lobbesbot: | A#353 O=200k HB=200k E=08-07 21:52:31 (7h36) >>> 250k rr q1 | [10:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#352 O=169k HB=169k E=08-07 21:48:47 (7h32) >>> 100k wwb q1 | [10:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#355 O=2.15mn HB=No bids E=08-09 11:40:50 (45h24) >>> 34426 B q88 | [10:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (25h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [10:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#354 O=5.05mn HB=6.5mn E=08-07 20:56:54 (6h40) >>> 16 imp stone adze q315940 | [10:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 6.869mn total bids --- | [10:16] |
| daemon9: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [10:23] |
| daemon9: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [10:23] |
| daemon9: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [10:24] |
| daemon9: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [10:24] |
| daemon9: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [10:24] |
| Guest17131: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [10:35] |
| Guest17131: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [10:35] |
| Guest17131: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [10:35] |
| Guest17131: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [10:35] |
| Guest17131: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [10:35] |
| diana_coman: | Mocky, bot got stuck on "waiting for build to finish" because it put cft into a tiny claim (possibly it remained with old recipe/failed to read in time the new enum?) | [10:50] |
| Mocky: | hmm | [10:50] |
| Mocky: | i saw this before and put in a fix. iirc I changed to wipe out old recipe at the start of each round | [10:51] |
| Mocky: | i'll have a look at the code, see if I can figure out how that can happen | [10:52] |
| Mocky: | diana_coman, anything abnormal looking in the bot output window prior to the cft transfer? | [10:53] |
| wodencafe2: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [10:54] |
| wodencafe2: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [10:54] |
| wodencafe2: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [10:54] |
| wodencafe2: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [10:54] |
| wodencafe2: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [10:54] |
| diana_coman: | Mocky, nope; it even says Tiny claim and then Building claim with 13 CFT | [10:56] |
| diana_coman: | possibly lag? does it wipe clean the recipe contents in between/before building? | [10:56] |
| Mocky: | just added the wipe clean after each build as part of build 28. I'll have to investigate | [10:58] |
| Jovan: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [11:02] |
| Jovan: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [11:02] |
| Jovan: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [11:02] |
| Jovan: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [11:02] |
| Jovan: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [11:02] |
| lobbesbot: | A#353 O=200k HB=200k E=08-07 21:52:31 (6h36) >>> 250k rr q1 | [11:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#352 O=169k HB=169k E=08-07 21:48:47 (6h32) >>> 100k wwb q1 | [11:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#355 O=2.15mn HB=No bids E=08-09 11:40:50 (44h24) >>> 34426 B q88 | [11:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (24h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [11:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#354 O=5.05mn HB=6.5mn E=08-07 20:56:54 (5h40) >>> 16 imp stone adze q315940 | [11:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 6.869mn total bids --- | [11:16] |
| RussellB2814: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [11:20] |
| RussellB2814: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [11:20] |
| RussellB2814: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [11:20] |
| RussellB2814: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [11:20] |
| RussellB2814: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [11:20] |
| diana_coman: | ugh, now bot took stuff with take all from table instead of claim and got stuck on it , Mocky | [11:34] |
| Mocky: | i just got that exact thing while looking into your prior issue | [11:35] |
| diana_coman: | heh | [11:35] |
| Mocky: | log looks correct, does 'use', waits for result, does /takeall, transfer key, targets table, then /takeall result from table... | [11:37] |
| Mocky: | i guess need to insert some more waiting | [11:37] |
| Mocky: | inserting waiting and checks is expensive in terms of quantity of new code. really need to rewrite the bot now that I have a better idea what direction this is going | [11:40] |
| diana_coman: | aha, it might be time for 3rd re-write :D | [11:43] |
| Mocky: | the wait-specific-amount-of-time-then-next-stage really is not working well for me | [11:45] |
| Mocky: | i bet fixes for the two issues mentioned here today push botactivity.cpp past 51\% mocky code by volume | [11:48] |
| Mocky: | or, more critically, i've about double the size of it without near doubling the functionality | [11:50] |
| diana_coman: | Mocky, point is not wait specific amount of time really; it's more like "keep trying/looking until x happens" | [11:55] |
| diana_coman: | but anyway, tbh I can see the need for re-write totally | [11:56] |
| diana_coman: | ftr 1st version was ideal: do x and then wake up only when expected-answer-y comes | [11:57] |
| diana_coman: | trouble with that was that ...y never came! | [11:57] |
| diana_coman: | so version 2 that is at the root of current code was made bullet-proof: heavy and clunky but SOLID | [11:57] |
| diana_coman: | meanwhile though server has changed, uses have changed, everything has changed! | [11:58] |
| Mocky: | by now i can see pretty clearly what shape i want it to have, but my knowledge of c++ finer points needs to catch up | [12:00] |
| diana_coman: | you can do it in ada directly :D | [12:00] |
| Mocky: | that would be something | [12:00] |
| diana_coman: | srsly you can have the project as a mix so do consider it at least | [12:01] |
| Mocky: | well i didn't know any c++ 2 months ago so i guess i can't really let not knowing ada stand in the way | [12:02] |
| diana_coman: | certainly | [12:02] |
| diana_coman: | and it's a way more profitable investment of one's time , honestly | [12:03] |
| Michail1: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [12:03] |
| Michail1: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [12:03] |
| Michail1: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [12:03] |
| Michail1: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [12:03] |
| Michail1: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [12:03] |
| Mocky: | of course hacking on something that already mostly works has been a pretty gentle on-ramp | [12:04] |
| diana_coman: | ditch the gentle and make life more interesting! | [12:06] |
| Mocky: | yeah, the idea has merit | [12:08] |
| Mocky: | does an ada version of the bot rule out a windows client? currently I'm testing all my stuff on windows as well | [12:11] |
| diana_coman: | Mocky, why would it rule it out? | [12:12] |
| diana_coman: | I haven't tried gnat on windows but I'd think it can be built for windows too | [12:13] |
| diana_coman: | you'll have to look into it I guess | [12:13] |
| Mocky: | yeah, I don't really know what's involved with a mixed project like that on linux or windows, but haven't heard anything about gnat on windows | [12:14] |
| diana_coman: | Mocky, hm, have you looked at adacore, do they support linux only? | [12:15] |
| diana_coman: | I'm not sure it's a great thing since you'll be stuck making sure it IS fully compliant with standard so that your code does compile then on linux but if you want to... | [12:15] |
| lobbesbot: | A#353 O=200k HB=200k E=08-07 21:52:31 (5h36) >>> 250k rr q1 | [12:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#352 O=169k HB=169k E=08-07 21:48:47 (5h32) >>> 100k wwb q1 | [12:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#355 O=2.15mn HB=No bids E=08-09 11:40:50 (43h24) >>> 34426 B q88 | [12:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (23h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [12:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#354 O=5.05mn HB=6.5mn E=08-07 20:56:54 (4h40) >>> 16 imp stone adze q315940 | [12:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 6.869mn total bids --- | [12:16] |
| Mocky: | i haven't looked at any of it yet. | [12:16] |
| peaches: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [12:16] |
| peaches: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [12:17] |
| peaches: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [12:17] |
| peaches: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [12:17] |
| peaches: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [12:17] |
| diana_coman: | lucky you, Mocky, brand new wonders to look at ! | [12:17] |
| Mocky: | damn it, bot just did takeall from table again | [12:17] |
| Mocky: | everything is a brand new wonder around here, lol | [12:18] |
| diana_coman: | heh, I know that feeling | [12:29] |
| Mocky: | which is exactly my speed, but mircea_popescu did warn me against getting overwhelmed by running after whatever shines | [12:29] |
| diana_coman: | there is that, yes; ada however is not really whatever shines | [12:29] |
| Mocky: | tru | [12:30] |
| diana_coman: | however, I admit I don't think it's really worth it much to bother with windows; that there is a bit ...dubious to justify really | [12:30] |
| diana_coman: | why do you want it on windows exactly? | [12:30] |
| Mocky: | seems like a waste to take something that runs just fine on both and kill off one without a good reason | [12:32] |
| diana_coman: | it's not about killing one off; thing is, windows is *tolerated* so basically IF it can run eulora's client then good for windows; otherwise, it's its problem | [12:36] |
| diana_coman: | but anyway, certainly no harm in *looking* into ada on windows, to know at least if it's an option or not | [12:37] |
| Mocky: | hey, maybe cockroach in my head. I come from java world where an 'int' was 32 bits on every platform in '98 and also today, and every program runs on every platform | [12:39] |
| diana_coman: | then again client code and platform are entirely the writer's call to make so ... | [12:39] |
| diana_coman: | well, as a client writer you would want it to run everywhere, sure | [12:39] |
| diana_coman: | but if a platform is braindamaged and fails to support the ada standard then... | [12:40] |
| diana_coman: | there is an ada standard so it *should* run everywhere | [12:40] |
| diana_coman: | but... | [12:40] |
| diana_coman: | doesn't trust shoulds in real world | [12:40] |
| exio428: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [12:41] |
| exio428: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [12:41] |
| exio428: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [12:41] |
| exio428: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [12:41] |
| exio428: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [12:41] |
| diana_coman: | Mocky, I suppose the iffier part is graphics in the long run | [12:41] |
| diana_coman: | so dunno, if you are already comfortable enough with c++ it might still make more sense to go ahead with it for now | [12:42] |
| Mocky: | all serious client side game stuff i've seen at is in c++, so no way around that. and honestly after 20 years for me it's about time to learn it | [12:44] |
| diana_coman: | there is that, true | [12:44] |
| Mocky: | also seems like some serious republican items will be in ada so no way around that either. | [12:44] |
| diana_coman: | Mocky, not like there isn't time later for ada too anyway | [12:46] |
| diana_coman: | and eulora client at any rate is possibly the least interconnected otherwise with everything else since its single requirement in this sense is "implement communication protocol" | [12:47] |
| diana_coman: | but nothing else | [12:47] |
| diana_coman: | so from a client writer long-term perspective I can certainly see the case for sticking to c++ at least for first client | [12:48] |
| nullrouted: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [12:49] |
| nullrouted: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [12:49] |
| nullrouted: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [12:49] |
| nullrouted: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [12:49] |
| nullrouted: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [12:49] |
| diana_coman: | basically retaining as much of the existing advantages as possible until one grows enough for more adventures | [12:49] |
| diana_coman: | Mocky, btw I did have a look and there seem to exist some pre-compiled ada dev env for windows; so at any rate, it should be...possible | [12:54] |
| diana_coman: | whether it's worth it atm or not though is a different question | [12:54] |
| Mocky: | right | [12:55] |
| Mocky: | well even should I implement some parts of client in ada, I expect I'll still need the c++ in order to clearly understand the integration points. so probably best to develop expertise there first | [13:02] |
| lobbesbot: | A#353 O=200k HB=200k E=08-07 21:52:31 (4h36) >>> 250k rr q1 | [13:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#352 O=169k HB=169k E=08-07 21:48:47 (4h32) >>> 100k wwb q1 | [13:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#355 O=2.15mn HB=No bids E=08-09 11:40:50 (42h24) >>> 34426 B q88 | [13:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (22h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [13:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#354 O=5.05mn HB=6.5mn E=08-07 20:56:54 (3h40) >>> 16 imp stone adze q315940 | [13:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 6.869mn total bids --- | [13:16] |
| diana_coman: | Mocky, sounds reasonable | [13:21] |
| Mocky: | well, it looks like I'm going to have to put my eulora work on the back burner for a bit and start full time job search. unfortunately. | [13:26] |
| mircea_popescu: | Mocky you got ax't ? | [14:14] |
| lobbesbot: | mircea_popescu: Sent 2 hours and 4 minutes ago: <asciilifeform> http://p.bvulpes.com/pastes/IHgO2/?raw=true | [14:14] |
| pokk9: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [14:14] |
| pokk9: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [14:14] |
| pokk9: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [14:14] |
| pokk9: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [14:15] |
| pokk9: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [14:15] |
| Mocky: | company's 10 days behind on payroll, asking us to be patient while money comes in. I don't believe them | [14:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#353 O=200k HB=200k E=08-07 21:52:31 (3h36) >>> 250k rr q1 | [14:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#352 O=169k HB=169k E=08-07 21:48:47 (3h32) >>> 100k wwb q1 | [14:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#355 O=2.15mn HB=No bids E=08-09 11:40:50 (41h24) >>> 34426 B q88 | [14:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (21h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [14:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#354 O=5.05mn HB=6.5mn E=08-07 20:56:54 (2h40) >>> 16 imp stone adze q315940 | [14:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 6.869mn total bids --- | [14:16] |
| mircea_popescu: | Mocky excellent move. | [14:23] |
| Mocky: | if news today was 'here's your check' I'd still be looking elsewhere, but news was 'wait moar' | [14:23] |
| mircea_popescu: | how about instead of doing any work whatsoever for them anymore, starting today, you instead take a 600mn ECu one time, two month salary to do client work while looking for a job ? | [14:24] |
| Mocky: | what does 600mn ecu exchange to in btc, i don't think i understand the conversion | [14:32] |
| mircea_popescu: | .60 | [14:32] |
| Mocky: | you have a deal | [14:34] |
| mircea_popescu: | you want ecu or teh btc equivalent ? | [14:34] |
| Mocky: | btc | [14:34] |
| mircea_popescu: | aite. when you find a job you may return pro-rated remainder and walk. | [14:35] |
| Mocky: | ok | [14:35] |
| mircea_popescu: | otherwise, you report to teh cto ( diana_coman ) | [14:36] |
| Mocky: | understood | [14:36] |
| mircea_popescu: | welcome abroad, mr record holder on consecutive not working bot builds :D | [14:37] |
| Birdman: | danielpbarron: around whenever | [14:37] |
| Mocky: | hey! I resemble that remark | [14:38] |
| diana_coman: | oh hey, welcome on board Mocky ! | [14:50] |
| Mocky: | diana_coman, thx! | [14:52] |
| diana_coman: | Mocky, what is in your pipeline for client work atm? | [14:58] |
| Mocky: | I have 1) takeall to table bot issue identified but not fixed, 2) bot stacking expecting wrong count from yesterday partially researched but issue not identified. 3) bot tried to build tiny with cft not yet researched 4) first stages of a new bot to do transfers between table and storage | [15:04] |
| diana_coman: | what do you mean by a new bot? | [15:06] |
| diana_coman: | is that different structure or just activity or what? | [15:06] |
| Mocky: | i started writing a brand new bot from scratch using nothing extant, but it's only just barely started and doesn't do anything yet | [15:08] |
| diana_coman: | ok, do you plan moving everything to that, correct? | [15:08] |
| Mocky: | if the end result seemed better, yes | [15:10] |
| diana_coman: | so maybe describe a bit what you have in mind so we can make sure it is better beforehand? | [15:12] |
| diana_coman: | basically if there are problems with current structure, it's worth writing them down and discussing them; similarly if there is a new structure proposed it's best writing it down and have it discussed, no? | [15:15] |
| Mocky: | yes, totally agree | [15:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#353 O=200k HB=200k E=08-07 21:52:31 (2h36) >>> 250k rr q1 | [15:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#352 O=169k HB=169k E=08-07 21:48:47 (2h32) >>> 100k wwb q1 | [15:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#355 O=2.15mn HB=No bids E=08-09 11:40:50 (40h24) >>> 34426 B q88 | [15:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (20h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [15:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#354 O=5.05mn HB=6.5mn E=08-07 20:56:54 (1h40) >>> 16 imp stone adze q315940 | [15:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 6.869mn total bids --- | [15:16] |
| Mocky: | what I have in mind is to create an abstraction for a step that requires a server request and response, for example a slot transfer | [15:16] |
| Mocky: | and then everything pertaining to that slot transfer, the request params, possible responses & timeout are all in one place | [15:17] |
| Mocky: | and then a separate piece that can run an arbitrary step, make the call, funnel server responses back to it | [15:18] |
| diana_coman: | that sounds good; potential trouble that I see atm is that request-response are not always that neat i.e. you may get several "responses" as it were and if you lose one of them then it's lost | [15:18] |
| diana_coman: | other than that yes, having a "step" building block would be quite useful | [15:21] |
| Mocky: | yes exactly. and when dealing with that so far i've pretty much made spaghetti code out of trying to capture that fact and communicate it to the code in different places. and i think i can sort of centralize the things that logiclaly belong togther | [15:21] |
| Mocky: | for example a slot transfer may wait for both inventory update and container update, and so would have an internal state to the step, without forcing outside code to care about the details | [15:24] |
| diana_coman: | ok ; how do you see it handling missing messages/lag/unexpected situations? | [15:25] |
| Cool_Fire: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [15:25] |
| Cool_Fire: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [15:25] |
| Cool_Fire: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [15:25] |
| Cool_Fire: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [15:25] |
| Cool_Fire: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [15:25] |
| Mocky: | and it would also be watching for 'it doesn't fit there' and 'too far away' etc. and i want to put all those things into the step and have the step runner subscribe it to those messages before running it | [15:28] |
| diana_coman: | does the step runner act as monitor as well to re-run/re-set or something if it gets stuck/timeouts? | [15:29] |
| diana_coman: | or? | [15:29] |
| Mocky: | so the 3rd piece would be the actual bot, that would parameterize the step, have the step runner run it, examine the results and make the decisions | [15:31] |
| Mocky: | and i think the bot logic could be quite compact | [15:31] |
| diana_coman: | well, the bot logic can get complex in itself but for good reasons (if you implement a more advanced explore bot for instance) | [15:34] |
| Mocky: | right | [15:35] |
| diana_coman: | it sounds good; q is whether it's not then best to move this first and move the explore to it solving 1,2,3 in one shot? it all depends though on how long you estimate it would take to have it | [15:37] |
| Mocky: | yeah and that's the thing i'm least confident estimating since writing something new in c++ is along the lines of >> http://logs.minigame.biz/2018-08-07.log.html#t16:06:17 | [15:40] |
| lobbesbot: | Logged on 2018-08-07 16:06:17: <diana_coman> ditch the gentle and make life more interesting! | [15:40] |
| Mocky: | maybe we give it a couple days and see how quickly i make progress on it | [15:42] |
| diana_coman: | sounds good, yes | [15:42] |
| diana_coman: | and ask in here if there's something I can perhaps help with | [15:42] |
| diana_coman: | or someone else for that matter | [15:43] |
| Mocky: | ok, I'm sure I'll have questions | [15:43] |
| diana_coman: | q about c++ are probably even better asked in #trilema ; q about eulora /client more likely here | [15:44] |
| Mocky: | alright | [15:45] |
| sscout23: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [16:03] |
| sscout23: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [16:03] |
| sscout23: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [16:03] |
| sscout23: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [16:03] |
| sscout23: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [16:03] |
| lobbesbot: | A#353 O=200k HB=200k E=08-07 21:52:31 (1h36) >>> 250k rr q1 | [16:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#352 O=169k HB=169k E=08-07 21:48:47 (1h32) >>> 100k wwb q1 | [16:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#355 O=2.15mn HB=No bids E=08-09 11:40:50 (39h24) >>> 34426 B q88 | [16:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (19h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [16:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#354 O=5.05mn HB=6.5mn E=08-07 20:56:54 (0h40) >>> 16 imp stone adze q315940 | [16:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 6.869mn total bids --- | [16:16] |
| lobbesbot: | AUCTION # 354 has ENDED: 16 imp stone adze q315940 SOLD to danielpbarron for 6.5mn coppers. Attn: Birdman | [16:57] |
| lobbesbot: | A#353 O=200k HB=200k E=08-07 21:52:31 (0h36) >>> 250k rr q1 | [17:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#352 O=169k HB=169k E=08-07 21:48:47 (0h32) >>> 100k wwb q1 | [17:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#355 O=2.15mn HB=No bids E=08-09 11:40:50 (38h24) >>> 34426 B q88 | [17:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (18h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [17:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 369k total bids --- | [17:16] |
| diana_coman: | Mocky, could the tiny-built-with-cft confusion be caused by an ord found? | [17:21] |
| Mocky: | hmm | [17:22] |
| diana_coman: | and ftr it failed to build the ord although I had a corresponding ord bundle in inv... | [17:22] |
| Mocky: | is this what happend before, or happened again? | [17:22] |
| diana_coman: | it happened now again; and I recall last time I did have an ord key in inv | [17:23] |
| diana_coman: | so possibly at that time too | [17:23] |
| diana_coman: | it's also a claim-dense area, if that's any help | [17:24] |
| diana_coman: | ftr ord was widow's whisp berry so dunno maybe it chokes on the ' | [17:25] |
| Mocky: | my only testing with ord has been without bundle or ingredients, happened 3 times recently. didn't have an issue but theres definitely a couple code paths in there that i wasn't able to test | [17:25] |
| Mocky: | think the apostrophe should be fine, nest has it and i get small wwb's regularly | [17:26] |
| diana_coman: | yes, but I meant re using bundle | [17:26] |
| diana_coman: | it has ord bundle and it failed to build the ord with it | [17:26] |
| diana_coman: | or hm, so I think i.e. I still have key (still hunting for that ord manually atm) | [17:26] |
| diana_coman: | omfg it did not LOCK it either!! | [17:27] |
| diana_coman: | so no build but also no lock, ugh | [17:27] |
| diana_coman: | guess I'm lucky it kept the key at least | [17:28] |
| Mocky: | oh that's bad | [17:28] |
| diana_coman: | lemme see if I can find it in all that bot spew.. | [17:28] |
| diana_coman: | doesn't it write it out to any file I could grep? | [17:29] |
| Mocky: | no, it does not | [17:29] |
| Mocky: | was planning for log file once i had a config file | [17:30] |
| diana_coman: | hm, it had somewhere some weird "inventory not showing results of /takeall | [17:30] |
| diana_coman: | and then still not updated. moving on | [17:30] |
| diana_coman: | although in next line it reports 18 wwb q53 | [17:31] |
| diana_coman: | and that is all from a tiny so it would fit | [17:31] |
| dx11: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [17:33] |
| dx11: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [17:33] |
| dx11: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [17:33] |
| dx11: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [17:33] |
| dx11: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [17:33] |
| diana_coman: | Mocky, ahaha, I found the ord: it goes "Ordinary claim: Widow's Whisp Berries " "Explore not finished, but timed out, will move on!" | [17:34] |
| diana_coman: | and then: move into claim marker failed | [17:34] |
| diana_coman: | locking glitched claim | [17:34] |
| diana_coman: | but for one thing...I could build it, so I don't think it was locked | [17:34] |
| Mocky: | ahh, strange | [17:34] |
| Mocky: | what did it report for marker eid? | [17:35] |
| diana_coman: | and for the other, what explore not finished if it even found the ord claim? | [17:35] |
| diana_coman: | uhm, it did not report any that I can see? | [17:35] |
| diana_coman: | no "found marker id" line at all there | [17:35] |
| diana_coman: | I think it basically moved on too early to get that or something | [17:36] |
| Mocky: | so it reports "ordinary claim" when it sees enumeration, but doesn't count the explore as finished until it has the marker | [17:36] |
| diana_coman: | so it didn't see the marker possibly because too many claims? | [17:36] |
| Mocky: | if it gets key, should dance around to make marker appear tho | [17:37] |
| diana_coman: | but then I thought it would dance around? | [17:37] |
| Mocky: | and you did get key | [17:37] |
| diana_coman: | yes; but shouldn't then "explore finish" be when you get key? | [17:37] |
| diana_coman: | if anyway marker based on key... | [17:37] |
| Mocky: | yeah that's pretty weird | [17:38] |
| diana_coman: | well, hopefully that step abstraction goes swimmingly and then you don't have any of those issues anymore ! | [17:39] |
| Mocky: | i'll be sweating it out one way or the other! | [17:40] |
| diana_coman: | cool | [17:40] |
| diana_coman: | oh, woa pops; congrats danielpbarron ! | [17:42] |
| danielpbarron: | ty | [17:43] |
| lobbesbot: | AUCTION # 352 has ENDED: 100k wwb q1 SOLD to mircea_popescu for 169k coppers. Attn: Mocky | [17:49] |
| lobbesbot: | AUCTION # 353 has ENDED: 250k rr q1 SOLD to danielpbarron for 200k coppers. Attn: Mocky | [17:52] |
| diana_coman: | Mocky, fwiw I think the "build tiny with cft" is somehow related to either lag or dense claims; I got it again almost as soon as I restarted bot in same area | [17:57] |
| Mocky: | really, hmm | [17:58] |
| diana_coman: | and yes, previous claim WAS small | [17:59] |
| Mocky: | i saw that exact same issue, most likely my fix was not fixxy enuf | [18:00] |
| Mocky: | most of these turn out to be either situations I didn't anticipate or lag poorly handled | [18:03] |
| Mocky: | danielpbarron, ready for your rr? | [18:04] |
| Mocky: | mircea_popescu, rdy for ur wwb? | [18:05] |
| mircea_popescu: | i r! | [18:06] |
| mircea_popescu: | Mocky you got change by any chance ? | [18:06] |
| Mocky: | nope :( | [18:07] |
| mircea_popescu: | dang. hang on. | [18:07] |
| Mocky: | thx | [18:08] |
| mircea_popescu: | cheerios | [18:08] |
| lobbesbot: | A#355 O=2.15mn HB=No bids E=08-09 11:40:50 (37h24) >>> 34426 B q88 | [18:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (17h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [18:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 0 total bids --- | [18:16] |
| mircea_popescu: | !Qcalc 2.69 * 60 * 5965 | [18:21] |
| lobbesbot: | mircea_popescu: 962751 | [18:21] |
| mircea_popescu: | !Qcalc .88 * 34426 * 59 | [18:21] |
| lobbesbot: | mircea_popescu: 1787397.92 | [18:21] |
| mircea_popescu: | !Qbid 355 2.15mn | [18:21] |
| lobbesbot: | AUCTION # 355: 34426 B q88 Heard: 2.15mn from mircea_popescu Ending: 2018-08-09 11:40:50 UTC (37 hours 19 mins) | [18:21] |
| ms782112: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [18:54] |
| ms782112: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [18:54] |
| ms782112: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [18:54] |
| ms782112: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [18:54] |
| ms782112: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [18:54] |
| lobbesbot: | A#355 O=2.15mn HB=2.15mn E=08-09 11:40:50 (36h24) >>> 34426 B q88 | [19:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (16h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [19:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 2.15mn total bids --- | [19:16] |
| jwhisnant18: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [19:59] |
| jwhisnant18: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [19:59] |
| jwhisnant18: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [19:59] |
| jwhisnant18: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [19:59] |
| jwhisnant18: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [19:59] |
| lobbesbot: | A#355 O=2.15mn HB=2.15mn E=08-09 11:40:50 (35h24) >>> 34426 B q88 | [20:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (15h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [20:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 2.15mn total bids --- | [20:16] |
| SkIzZaTo: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [20:49] |
| SkIzZaTo: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [20:49] |
| SkIzZaTo: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [20:50] |
| SkIzZaTo: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [20:50] |
| SkIzZaTo: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [20:50] |
| lobbesbot: | A#355 O=2.15mn HB=2.15mn E=08-09 11:40:50 (34h24) >>> 34426 B q88 | [21:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (14h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [21:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 2.15mn total bids --- | [21:16] |
| justyns: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [21:35] |
| justyns: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [21:35] |
| justyns: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [21:35] |
| justyns: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [21:35] |
| justyns: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [21:35] |
| BranchPredictor2: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [21:50] |
| BranchPredictor2: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [21:50] |
| BranchPredictor2: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [21:50] |
| BranchPredictor2: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [21:50] |
| BranchPredictor2: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [21:50] |
| smidlers21: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [22:07] |
| smidlers21: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [22:07] |
| smidlers21: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [22:07] |
| smidlers21: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [22:07] |
| smidlers21: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [22:07] |
| lobbesbot: | A#355 O=2.15mn HB=2.15mn E=08-09 11:40:50 (33h24) >>> 34426 B q88 | [22:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (13h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [22:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 2.15mn total bids --- | [22:16] |
| Birdman: | !Qcalc 60*5965*2.69 | [22:16] |
| lobbesbot: | Birdman: 962751 | [22:16] |
| danielpbarron: | ready to settle auctions | [22:18] |
| and: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [22:20] |
| and: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [22:20] |
| Birdman: | omw danielpbarron | [22:20] |
| and: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [22:20] |
| and: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [22:20] |
| and: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [22:20] |
| Birdman: | 27279000 send it to deedbot plz | [22:21] |
| danielpbarron: | !Q calc 27279000*0.000000001 | [22:21] |
| lobbesbot: | danielpbarron: 0.027279 | [22:21] |
| danielpbarron: | !Q calc (27279000 + 1100000)*0.000000001 | [22:24] |
| lobbesbot: | danielpbarron: 0.028379 | [22:24] |
| Mocky: | sausage party in town tonight I see | [22:25] |
| Mocky: | danielpbarron, trade me when rdy for your rr | [22:26] |
| danielpbarron: | ready | [22:27] |
| danielpbarron: | what do i owe ya | [22:27] |
| Mocky: | 200k | [22:27] |
| danielpbarron: | ty | [22:27] |
| Mocky: | thx | [22:27] |
| Guest57686: | Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times? | [22:37] |
| Guest57686: | This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes. | [22:37] |
| Guest57686: | Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence? | [22:37] |
| Guest57686: | Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/status/1025461692132519936 | [22:37] |
| Guest57686: | Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/ | [22:37] |
| Mocky: | diana_coman, I just ran into your stacking issue from yesterday. Turns out that if you get multiple quality outputs that fall into the same band, and if the table contains an exact quality match to at least one (but not all) then the bot will always try to mix together an improper count (as you saw) by not taking into consideration the exact match that was moved first; and then it will always choke on its false expectations | [23:05] |
| Mocky: | i have to say that it's definitely not safe to run the bot because this situation will almost always result in loss of value. I have a fix but will not be able to complete testing until tomorrow. | [23:07] |
| Mocky: | you know, just in case bot walking away from ords unbuilt and unlocked that it had the bundle for didn't disuade you.. | [23:15] |
| lobbesbot: | A#355 O=2.15mn HB=2.15mn E=08-09 11:40:50 (32h24) >>> 34426 B q88 | [23:16] |
| lobbesbot: | A#351 O=1.32mn HB=No bids E=08-08 15:47:31 (12h31) >>> 5965 CDG q269 | [23:16] |
| lobbesbot: | --- end of auction list, 2.15mn total bids --- | [23:16] |
Comments feed: RSS 2.0